Estimation of the factor influence on the quality of life of socio-economic groups using panel data analysis methods
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5024-2026-1-98-111
Abstract
Aim. To examine the current state of living standards in Russia in recent years and the reasons for this situation. To study the key factors influencing the quality of life of Russians across socioeconomic groups using panel data analysis methods.
Methodology. The econometric study was conducted using The Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey – Higher School of Economics (RLMS-HSE) data for the period from 2013 to 2024. The selected period allows us to assess not only the general trends of recent years but also the impact of recent economic crises.
Results. The estimates demonstrated the validity of dividing the sample into groups and the differences in assessments of some variables across subgroups. Key differences in quality of life assessments were identified for gender groups, individuals with different levels of education, and those living in urban and rural areas.
Research implications. The obtained results demonstrated differences in quality-of-life assessments between different social groups. Not only socioeconomic characteristics but also the federal district of residence proved significant. The data can be used to formulate state social policy to identify the groups most in need at the regional level.
About the Authors
A. R. Kalinin
"Moscow University "Synergy" (Synergy University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander R. Kalinin – Dr. Sci. (Economics), Prof., Valuation and Corporate Finance Department, "Moscow University "Synergy" (Synergy University).
Moscow
D. V. Yustratov
"Moscow University "Synergy" (Synergy University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Denis V. Yustratov – Postgraduate Student, "Moscow University "Synergy" (Synergy University).
Moscow
References
1. Murgaš, F., Macků, K., Grežo, H. & Petrovič, F. (2023). The Concept of Quality of Life and Its Application Using the World Value Survey Wave 7: Slovak Experience. In: GeoJournal, 88, 6285–6302. DOI: 10.1007/s10708-023-10969-5
2. Imbulana, A. J. & Managi, S. (2023). The Role of Social Capital in Subjective Quality of Life. In: Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 31. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-01502-7
3. Ouakil, H., Tarik, L. Ouazzani, H. & Moustabchir, A. (2024). Understanding the Role of Income in Personal Happiness: A Comprehensive PSM Analysis in the United States. In: The Pakistan Development Review, 63, 3, 399–416.
4. Salameh, A. A., Amin, S., Danish, M. H., Asghar, N. & Naveed, R. T. (2022). Munir Socio-economic Determinants of Subjective Wellbeing toward Sustainable Development Goals: An Insight from a Developing Country. In: Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 961400. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.961400
5. Yustratov, D. V. (2025). The Concept of “Quality of Life” and Various Approaches to Its Assessment. In: Russian Economic Bulletin, 3, 383–389 (in Russ.).
6. Zotikov, N. Z. (2025). Quality of Life as a Socio-Economic Indicator of Socio-Economic Development of the Region. In: Siberian Financial School, 1, 151–160. DOI: 10.34020/1993-4386-2025-1-151-160 (in Russ.).
7. Degtyarev, N. I. (2024). Social Status and Standard of Living of the Russian Population in the Context of Spatial Development Strategy. In: Geopolitics and Ecogeodynamics of Regions, 10, 24–40 (in Russ.).
8. Malakhov, A. V., Vlasova, O. V., Eskova, N. A. & Reprintseva, E. V. (2023). Living Standards and Poverty in Russia: Trends and Factors of Influence. In: Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Management, 2 (43), 32–36 (in Russ.).
9. Ermilina, D. A. (2022). Life Quality in Russia: A Brief Overview. In: Vestnik Universiteta, 3, 97–107. DOI: 10.26425/1816-4277-2022-3-97-107 (in Russ.).
10. Saraykin, V. A., Nikulina, Yu. N. & Yanbykh, R. G. (2023). Subjective Well-Being of Rural Dwellers in Russia: Factors and Their Significance. In: Journal of Economic Sociology, 24, 1. 71–105 (in Russ.).
11. Mitroshin, I. V. (2022). The Impact of Urbanization on Living Standards of the Population in Russia. In: Journal of Volgograd State University. Economics, 4, 85–94. DOI: 10.18572/2500-0292-2025-1-26-29 (in Russ.).
12. Antipina, O. N. & Khomutov, A. A. (2024). How Does Life Satisfaction Depend on the Settlement Type? In: Issues of Economic Theory, 2, 103–114 (in Russ.).
13. Nikitina, E. A. (2024). Life Satisfaction of Elderly Women and Men. In: Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 1, 143–157. DOI: 10.21638/spbu16.2024.109 (in Russ.).
14. Chernykh, E. A. (2023). Quality of Working Life and Job Satisfaction of Russian Women and Men: A Comparative Analysis. In: Social and Labor Research, 3, 87–102 (in Russ.).
15. Kalinin, A. R. & Yustratov, D. V. (2025). The Relationship between Life Satisfaction and the Number of Children in the Family. In: Economics and Management, 31, 7, 882–892. DOI: 10.35854/1998-1627-2025-7-882-892 (in Russ.).
Review
Views:
61
JATS XML
Email this article 