The Role of the State in the System Formation of the Future Socio-Economic Reality
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-6646-2023-2-6-14
Abstract
Aim. To give a theoretical interpretation of the role of the state in structuring systemic integrity, allowing understanding the extent to which it is able to participate in the formation of socio-economic integrity.
Methodology. The main content of the study lies in the author’s attempt, made on the basis of dialectical logic, the conclusions of system theories and the analysis of the views of Russian philosophers A.A. Bogdanov, N.F. Ovchinnikov, to determine the theoretical meaning of the state’s actions to strengthen the integrity of any system in the sphere of the economy or society.
Results. It is shown in the abstract sense the integrity of the system is associated with the quality of its structural component, represented by the state. The modern interpretation of the state is substantiated, which implies an increase in the importance of the subjective component in the processes of system formation in the economy and society. It is concluded that the conservative beginning of the state and its fundamental inability to serve as a driver of a new social reality are based on its endlessly repeated attempts to strengthen existing structural ties and multiply their number.
Research implications are to determine the role of the state as a structure of economic and social formations in ensuring structural stability by generating a hierarchy of structural levels and increasing structural ties in the socio-economic system.
About the Author
Ya. I. Vaslavskiy
Moscow State Institute of International Relations
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yan I. Vaslavskiy – Cand. Sci. (Political Science), Assoc. Prof., Department of Political Theory
Vernadskogo 76, Moscow 119454, Moscow
References
1. Bertalanffy L. von. General System Theory: A Survey (Rus. ed.: Yudin Yu. G., transl. Obshchaya teoriya sistem: osnovy, razvitie, primeneniya. In: Sistemnye issledovaniya: Yezegodnik [Systems Research: Yearbook]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1969, pp. 30–54).
2. Bogdanov A. A. [Essays on Organizational Science]. In: WikiReadings. Available at: https://fil.wikireading.ru/44132 (accessed: 01.02.2023).
3. Vaslavskiy Ya. I. [Aggregation of Public Choice: Partnership between the State and Business in Structuring Post-Coronavirus Reality]. In: Federalizm, 2020, no. 2 (98), P. 51–75.
4. Vaslavskiy Ya. I. Gosudarstvo i biznes v strukturirovaniyi sotsial’noy real’nosti budushchego: opyt politiko-ekonomicheskogo issledovaniya [The State and Business in Structuring the Social Reality of the Future: Experience of Political-Economic Research]. Moscow, Moscow State Institute of International Relations Publ., 2022. 310 p.
5. Vaslavskiy Ya. I. [The State and Institutionalization of the “Social Order”]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika [Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series: Economics], 2022, no. 3, pp. 21–28.
6. Goldin Ya. [Reconceptualizing Global Sustainability: Pandemic Strains Economic and Social Fault Lines]. In: Finansy i razvitie. Ezhekvartal'noe izdanie MVF [Finance and Development. Quarterly publication of the IMF], 2020, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 5–9.
7. Ovchinnikov N. F. Printsipy sokhraneniya [Principles of Conservation]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1996. 330 p.
8. Ovchinnikov N. F., Alekseyev I. S., Pechenkin A. A. Printsip simmetrii. Istoriko-metodologicheskiye problemy [Principle of Symmetry: Historical and Methodological Problems]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1978. 397 p.
9. Prigozhin A. I. Sovremennaya sotsiologiya organizatsiy [Modern Sociology of Organizations]. Moscow, Interpraks Publ., 1995. 295 p.
10. Raghuram G. R. Faut Lines. How Hidden Fractures still Threaten the World Economy (Rus. ed.: Fridman I., transl. Linii razloma: kak skrytyye treshchiny vse yeshchye ugrozhayut mirovoy ekonomike. Moscow, Gaidar Institute Publ., 2011. 416 p.).
Review
Views:
228
Email this article 