SWOT-analysis of forms of classical public-private partnership
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-6646-2023-3-103-111
Abstract
Aim. Conducting a SWOT analysis of the forms of classical public-private partnership (hereinafter – PPP) based on the definition and disclosure of its features.
Methodology. The methodological basis of the study was the dialectical method of cognition and general scientific methods based on it, in particular the method of analysis (contributed to the identification of the results of the use of forms of classical PPP in Russia for 2016-2022), the method of synthesis (provided the unification into a single whole of the features of forms of classical PPP), logical methods (contributed to the establishment of the trajectory of the future development of forms of classical PPP), the expert evaluation method (contributed to the proposal of measures for the development of forms of classical PPP).
Results. The composition and features of the forms of classical PPP are disclosed. The characteristics of their strengths and weaknesses, as well as the external environment, are presented, on the basis of which measures for the development of PPP in Russia are proposed.
Research implications. The theoretical significance lies in the development of the scientific foundations of the forms of classical PPP. The practical significance is connected with the possibility of using the results obtained when making decisions to ensure the sustainable development of the regions of Russia.
About the Author
I. M. Shor
Volgograd State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Inna M Shor – Cand. Sci (Economics), Assoc. Prof., Department of Finance, Accounting and Economic Security
100 Universitetsky Prosp., 400062, Volgograd
References
1. Borshevskiy G. A. [Assessment of the activity of regional governments in attracting off-budget investments in infrastructure development]. In: Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal’nogo upravleniya [Issues of state and municipal administration], 2018, no. 4, pp. 7–41.
2. Valishvili M. A. [Quasi-partnership forms of interaction between the state and business in innovative development]. In: Vestnik universiteta [University Bulletin], 2022, no. 1, pp. 36–42.
3. Makarenko S. I. Spravochnik nauchnykh terminov i oboznacheniy [Handbook of scientific terms and designations]. St. Petersburg, Nauchnoemkie tekhnologii Publ., 2019. 254 p.
4. Medzhidov Z. U. [Forms of public-private partnership in Russia: comparative analysis]. In: Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2022, no. 3, pp. 73–95.
5. Mironova I. A., Tishchenko T. I., Frolova M. P. [External effects from the implementation of socially significant projects for the development of transport infrastructure]. In: Trudy ISA RAN [Works of the Institute of Socio-Economic Studies of Population of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2021, vol. 71, iss. 2, pp. 80–91.
6. Pastukhanov A. E. [Private financing of PPP projects in Russia: opportunities and risks]. In: EKO [ECO], 2018, no. 8, pp. 113–132.
7. Semenova N. N. [Public-private partnership in innovative development of the Russian economy]. In: Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo. [Economics. Taxes. Law.], 2020, no. 13 (3), pp. 59–69.
8. Soltangazinov A. R., Isenova G. K., Kaydarova L. K. [Models and forms of public-private partnership]. In: Vestnik Belgorodskogo universiteta kooperatsii, ekonomiki i prava [Bulletin of the Belgorod University of Cooperation, Economics and Law], 2019, no. 5, pp. 95–104.
9. Stukalova I. B., Provalenova N. V. [Foreign experience in developing the market of housing and communal services based on public-private partnership]. In: Vestnik NGIEI [Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Institute of Economics and Law], 2018, no. 1 (80). pp. 76–88.
10. Tkachenko I. N., Evseeva M. V. [Possibility of using contractual forms of public-private partnership and special investment contract in the implementation of complex investment projects for the development of territories]. In: Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo [PublicPrivate Partnership], 2016, vol. 3, no. 4. pp. 273–290.
Review
Views:
96
Email this article 