The impact of generative artificial intelligence on industry productivity in the context of the Russian economy
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5024-2024-4-80-93
Abstract
Aim. The emergence of the modern general-purpose technologies makes it possible to use them effectively in solving practical economic problems, including increasing productivity. In this regard, it is relevant to assess the impact of generative artificial intelligence on industry productivity, which determined the purpose of this work.
Methodology. The modified production function of D. Asemoglu was used as a methodological basis. Based on the meta-analysis, penetration coefficients were obtained for each type of economic activity, and their development trajectories were modeled.
Results. In economic activities where the influence of generative artificial intelligence slightly increases productivity, additional support measures are needed to train and improve the skills of existing employees, which will at least partially offset the personnel deficit in the Russian economy.
Research implications. The theoretical value of the work lies in the development of a methodological basis for analyzing labor productivity. The practical value of the work lies in the formation of recommendations for increasing the growth of industrial output by increasing productivity in the context of the Russian economy.
Keywords
About the Authors
P. L. OtotskiyRussian Federation
Peter L. Ototskiy – Cand. Sci (Phys.-Math.), Head, Research and Development Artificial Intelligence in the Sphere of the Public Government Department
pr-t Vernadskogo 82, str. 1, Moscow 119571
E. N. Gorlacheva
Russian Federation
Evgeniya N. Gorlacheva – Dr. Sci. (Economics), Assoc. Prof., Leading Researcher, Research and Development Artificial Intelligence in the Sphere of the Public Government Department
pr-t Vernadskogo 82, str. 1, Moscow 119571
E. A. Pospelova
Russian Federation
Ekaterina A. Pospelova – Сand. Sci. (Political Sciences), Senior Researcher, Research and Development Artificial Intelligence in the Sphere of the Public Government Department
pr-t Vernadskogo 82, str. 1, Moscow 119571
References
1. Vashalomidze E. V., Dudin M. N. [Labor Productivity, Level and Quality of The Russian Population: Dynamics of Change and Modern Trends of Mutual Influence]. In: Sotsial’notrudovye issledovaniia [Social and Labor Research], 2022, no. 4, pp. 49–60.
2. Gimpelson V. E., Kapelyushnikov R. I. Rutinnost’ i riski avtomatizatsii na rossiiskom rynke truda: preprint WP3/04 [Routine and Risks of Automation in The Russian Labor Market: Preprint WP3/04]. Moscow, Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki Publ., 2022. 44 p.
3. Kolesnikova O. A., Maslova E. V., Okolelykh I. V. [Personnel Shortage in The Modern Russian Labor Market: Manifestations, Causes, Trends, Coping Measures]. In: Sotsial’no-trudovye issledovaniia [Social and Labor Research], 2023, no. 4, pp. 179–189.
4. Nizhegorodtsev R. M. [Logistic Modeling of Economic Dynamics. Part 1]. In: Problemy upravleniia [Problems of Management], 2004, no. 1, pp. 46–53.
5. Korovkin A. G., Dolgova I. N., Edinak E. A., Korolev I. B. [Predictive and Analytical Study of the Interrelationships of Employment and Vocational Education in Russia]. In: Vestnik Rossiiskogo fonda fundamental’nykh issledovanii. Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki [Bulletin of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research. Humanities and Social Sciences], 2018, no. 4 (93), pp. 38–49. DOI: 10.22204/2587-8956-2018-093-04-38-49
6. Gimpelson V., Kapelyushnikov R., Roshchina S. Rossiiskii rynok truda: tendentsii, instituty, strukturnye izmeneniia: Doklad Tsentra trudovykh issledovanii i Laboratorii issledovanii rynka truda NIU VShE [The Russian Labor Market: Trends, Institutions, Structural Changes: Report of the Center for Labor Research and the Laboratory for Labor Market Research at the Higher School of Economics]. Moscow, 2017. Available at: https://www.csr.ru/upload/iblock/861/86192da819e23b2d7ce2161f7718a32f.pdf (accessed: 19.08.2024).
7. Takovin E. P. [Shortage of Personnel in Russia: Reasons and Directions of Solutions]. In: Gumanitarii Iuga Rossii [Humanities of the South of Russia], 2024, no. 4, pp. 104–120.
8. Autor D. The Labor Market Impacts of Technological Change: From Unbrilled Enthusiasm to Qualified Optimism to Vast Uncertainty. In: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), 2022, working paper no. 30074. DOI: 10.3386/w30074. Available at: https://www.nber.org/papers/w30074 (accessed: 19.08.2024).
9. Autor D. H. Work of the Past, Work of the Future. In: AEA Papers and Proceedings, 2019, vol. 109, pp. 1–32. DOI: 10.1257/pandp.20191110
10. Acemoglu D., Restrepo P. Artificial Intelligence, Automation and Work. In: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), 2018, working paper no. 214196. Available at: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w24196/w24196.pdf (accessed: 19.08.2024).
11. Acemoglu D., Restrepo P. The Race between Man and Machine: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares and Employment. In: American Economic Review, 2018, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1488–1542.
12. Brynjolfsson E., Li D., Raymond L. Generative AI at Work. In: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), 2023, working paper no. 31161. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4426942 (accessed: 19.08.2024).
13. Cheng L., Li X., Bing L. Is GPT-4 a Good Data Analyst? 2023, arXiv:2305.15038. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2305.15038. Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.15038 (accessed: 19.08.2024).
14. Felten E., Raj M., Seamans R. Occupational, Industry, and Geographic Exposure to Artificial Intelligence: A Novel Dataset and Its Potential Uses. In: Strategic Management Journal, 2021, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 2195–2217.
15. Edelman B. G., Ngwe D., Peng S. Measuring the Impact of AI on Information Worker Productivity. 2023. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4648686 (accessed: 19.08.2024).
16. Eisfeldt A., Schubert G., Zhang M. Generative AI and Firm Values. In: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), 2023, working papers no. 31222. Available at: https://www.nber.org/papers/w31222 (accessed: 19.08.2024).
17. Wei J., Tay Y., Bommasani R., Raffel C., Zoph B., Borgeaud S., Yogatama D. Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models, Transactions on Machine Learning Research. 2022, arXiv:2206.07682. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.07682 (accessed: 14.08.2024).
18. Tolan S., Pesole A., Plumed F. M., Macias E. F. Measuring the Occupational Impact of AI: Tasks, Cognitive Abilities and AI Benchmarks. In: JRC Working Papers Series on Labour, Education and Technology, 2020, no. 2020/02, pp. 4–36. DOI: 10.1613/jair.1.12647
19. Nakavachara V., Potipiti T. Chaiwat Experimenting with Generative AI: Does ChatGPT Really Increase Everyone’s Productivity? 2024. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4746770 (accessed: 14.08.2024).
20. Walkowiak E. Task-Interdependencies between Generative AI and Workers. In: Economics Letters, 2023, vol. 231, no. 111315. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111315. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4461406 (accessed: 14.08.2024).
21. Walkowiak E., MacDonald T. Generative AI and the Workforce: What Are the Risks? 2023. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4568684 (accessed: 14.08.2024).
22. Webb M. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Labor Market. 2019, SSRN 3482150. Available at: https://www.michaelwebb.co/webb_ai.pdf (accessed: 14.08.2024).
23. Zarifhonarvar A. Economics of ChatGPT: A Labor Market View on the Occupational Impact of Artificial Intelligence. In: Journal of Electronic Business & Digital Economics, 2023. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4350925. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4350925 (accessed: 14.08.2024).