Innovation potential of economic barometers
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5024-2025-3-47-56
Abstract
Aim. In today’s world, where technological progress and innovation are playing an increasingly important role in economic development, it is necessary to have effective tools to measure and evaluate the innovative potential of various industries.
Methodology. The research methodology is based on various methods such as analysis and synthesis, systematization and classification, observation and comparison, diagnostic approach, etc. The methods used made it possible to deepen the understanding of the subject of the study and obtain appropriate conclusions.
Results. The analysis of the data obtained allowed us to show the relationship between the level of innovation potential and economic activity. In addition, it was found that economic barometers can serve as a reliable indicator of future economic development.
Research implications. The study confirms the importance of developing innovative potential to achieve economic growth and sustainable development. Moreover, the results of the study indicate the need for effective government regulation and support of innovation activities in the country.
About the Authors
V. Grishin
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valentin N. Grishin (Moscow) – Cand. Sci. (Economics), Assoc. Prof., Innovation Management Department
P. Gureev
State University of Management;
Russian University of Transport
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Pavel M. Gureev (Moscow) – Cand. Sci. (Economics), Assoc. Prof., Innovation Management in Transport Department, Assoc. Prof., Economic Policy and Economic Measurements Department
K. Sergeeva
Russian University of Transport
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kseniya N. Sergeeva (Moscow) – Cand. Sci. (Economics), Assoc. Prof., Innovation Management Department
References
1. Aleksandrov, Yu. L. & Demchenko, O. S. (2011). Methodology of Forecasting the Macroeconomic Dynamics of Russia. In: Creative Economy, 5 (53), 133–139 (in Russ.).
2. Aleksandrov, Yu. L. & Demchenko O. S. (2014). Indicators of retail trade as anticipating indices of the economic situation in Russia. In: Problems Modern Economcs, 2 (50), 334–337 (in Russ.).
3. Bystrova, I. V. (2002). Kondratiev’s Conjuncture Institute: A Unique Experience of the 1920s. In: From the history of Economic thought and the National Economy of Russia, V. 3, pp. 87–108. (in Russ.).
4. Ivanov, O. B. & Buhvald, E. M. (2023). Strategizing in Conditions of Uncertainty: Goals and Tools. In: ETAP: Economic Theory, Analysis, and Practice, 1, 7–26 (in Russ.).
5. Onuchin, S. V. (2014). Factors of Economic Instability In: Problems of Modern Economics Factors of instability in the economy, 3 (51), 98–102 (in Russ.).
6. Pervushin, S. A. (1929). Economic Barometers and Ways of Market Forecasting. In: Planned Economy, 6, 117–144 (in Russ.).
7. Pohodina, M. A. (2023). The Use of Probabilistic Theory in Forecasting Economic Indicators. In: Trends in the Development of Science and Education, 2023, 104, 165–167 (in Russ.).
8. Kamchatova, E. Yu., Grishin, V. N., Gureev, P. M., Degtyareva, V. V., Dunenkova, E. N., Onishchenko, S. I. Prokhorova I. S. et. al. (2023). Development of the Innovative Potential of Industry in the Context of Ensuring the Technological Sovereignty of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Rusains publ. (in Russ.).
9. Ekonomika (2012). In: Monitoring Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 4 (110), pp. 101–106 (in Russ.).
10. Grishin, V. N., Feshina, S. S. & Konovalova, O. V. (2021). Digital Business Development in the Urban Environment of the Future: Economic and Social Effects. In: Socio-economic Systems: Paradigms for the Future, 314. Springer International Publishing, pp. 819–826. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-56433-9_86
11. Gureev, P. M., Grishin, V. N. & Fayustov, A. A. (2022). Transdisciplinarity of Strategic Business Management. In: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 398, 153–159. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-94870-2_21
Review
Views:
7
Email this article 