Preview

Bulletin of the State University of Education. Series: Economics

Advanced search

STIMULATION OF INDUSTRIAL TERRITORIAL CLUSTERS TO IMPLEMENT THE MODEL OF OPEN INNOVATION IN THE CONDITIONS OF NEW CHALLENGES

https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-6646-2022-3-89-104

Abstract

Aim. Development of approaches to stimulating the innovation and technological development of Russia based on the revitalization of industrial territorial clusters and the implementation of the open innovation model.

Methodology. The methodological basis of the study includes theories of strategic management, technologization of management and digitalization of business models, cluster development. A comparative analysis was used as the leading method, which made it possible to explore the criteria, methods and models for the development of innovative industrial territorial clusters in Russia. Logical and historical research methods have revealed the evolution of the key criteria for the segmentation of industrial companies. A comprehensive economic analysis made it possible to study the dynamics of key indicators and identify promising mechanisms for stimulating the innovation and technological development of Russia based on the integration of science and education, the introduction of an open innovation model in the activities of clusters. Thus, the development of theoretical approaches and practical skills to stimulate the activities of industrial territorial clusters contributes to the solution of a multi-purpose function aimed at solving industrial, social, environmental, technical and technological problems.

Research implications. The study reveals is due to the need to intensify the country’s innovative and technological development in order to achieve the strategic goals of developing the national economy, which include increasing the share of innovatively active companies up to 50%, reducing poverty by half, and the Russian economy entering the top five world powers. by 2024

Results. An assessment of the dynamic efficiency of innovation activity was made from the standpoint of achieving the KPI of the regions. The mechanisms of stimulating the activity of industrial territorial clusters and methods of their management are revealed. The results of the study allow us to draw the following main conclusion: in the Russian Federation, the strategic competitive advantage of companies is based on the introduction of technological innovations and technologization of management, which form the necessary material base for an innovative economy and contribute to the solution of social problems. To ensure sustainable development, Russian clusters need to focus their activities on the priority implementation of technological innovations; introduction of an open innovation model; increase investment and innovation activity in the development and application of digital and advanced production technologies; to carry out the transition to the model of corporate financing of innovation and technological development.

About the Authors

T. V. Pogodina
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Tatyana V. Pogodina – Dr . Sci . (Economics), Prof ., Deputy Head for Research, Department of Financial and Investment Management, Graduate School of Management Faculty

49/2 Leningradsky prosp., Moscow 125167



M. Ya. Veselovsky
Technological University
Russian Federation

Mihail Ya. Veselovsky – Dr . Sci . (Economics), Prof ., Head of Department, Department of Management

42 Gagarina ul., Korolev, Moscow region, 141074



V. E. Barkovskaya
Technological University
Russian Federation

Victoria E. Barkovskaya –Сand . Sci . (Economics), Assoc . Prof ., Department of Management

42 Gagarina ul., Korolev, Moscow region, 141074



P. P. Pilipenko
Russian University of Economics named after G. V. Plekhanov
Russian Federation

Pavel P. Pilipenko – Dr . Sci . (Economics), Prof ., Director, Graduate School of Management

36 Stremyanny per., 36, Moscow 117997



References

1. Kostenko O. V. [Cluster management companies: Russian and foreign experience]. In: Fundamental'nye issledovaniya [Fundamental research], 2017, No. 10–3, pp. 594–599.

2. Kutsenko E. S., Abashkin V. L., Fiyaksel E. A., Islankina E. A. [Ten years of cluster policy in Russia: logic of departmental approaches].In: Innovacii [Innovations], 2017, no. 12(230), pp. 46–58.

3. Solovey O. V. [Innovative Forms of Interaction in the System “Education – Science – Business”: Advantages And Disadvantages]. In: Ekonomika obrazovaniya [Economics of education], 2013, no. 5, pp. 37–46.

4. Douglas E. J. Dean A. S. Self-employment as a career choice: Attitudes, entrepreneurial intentions, and utility maximization. In: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2002, no 26 (3), pp. 81–90.

5. Drucker P. The discipline of innovation. In: Harvard Business Review. 2002, no 80(8), pp. 95–106.

6. Granovetter M. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. In: American Journal of Sociology, 1985, pp. 481–510.

7. Henderson V., Kuncoro A., Turner M. Industrial Development in Cities. In: Journal of Political Economy, 2015. № 103. Р. 1067–1090.

8. Hitka M., Lorincová S., Ližbetinová L. Cluster analysis used as the strategic advantage of human resource management in small and medium-sized enterprises in the wood-processing industry]. In: BioRes, 2017, no 12 (4), pp. 7884–7897.

9. Kirzner I. [Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach]. In: Journal of Economic Literature, 1997, no 35 (1), pp. 60–85.

10. Krueger Norris F. Jr., Michael D. Reilly, Alan L. Carsrud Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 2000, no 15(5–6), pp. 411–432.

11. Lung L., Maw-Shin Hsu, Feng-Jyh Lin, Yi-Min Chen, Yi-Hsin Lin. The effects of industry cluster knowledge management on innovation performance. In: Journal of Business Research, 2014, no 67, pp. 734–739.

12. Pogodina T. V., Muzhzhavleva T. V., Udaltsova N. L. Strategic management of the competitiveness of industrial companies in an unstable economy. In: Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 2020, no 7(3), pp. 1555–1564.

13. Rowold J., Schlotz W. [Transformational and Transactional Leadership and Followers, Chronic Stress].In: Leadership Review, 2009, no 9, pp. 35–48.

14. Rakhimova S., Goncharenko L., Sybachin S., Kunanbayeva K., Zayed N. An empirical analysis on the formation of modern structure of the national economy using digital technology. In: Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 2021, no 20(1), pp. 1–15.

15. Rakhimova S., Kunanbayeva K., Goncharenko L., Pigurin A. Balanced system of indicators for the assessment of innovative construction projects efficiency. In: E3S Web of Conferences, 2019, no 110, pp. 21–54.

16. Trachuk A.V., Linder N. V. The impact of financial capital on innovative behavior of industrial companies. In: Finance: Theory and Practice, 2021, no 25(1), pp. 51–69.

17. Trachuk A., Linder N. Innovation and Performance: An Empirical Study of Russian Industrial Companies. In: International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 2018, no 15(3), pp. 185.

18. Veselovsky M. Y., Pogodina T. V., Lobacheva E. N., Pilipenko P. P. Organization and management of clusters in Russia in the context of import substitution. In: European Research Studies Journal, 2018, no 21(4), pp. 142–150.


Review

Views: 138


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5040 (Print)
ISSN 2949-5024 (Online)